Common-Sense Regulation Becomes “There Is No Right To Bear Arms- A Comprehensive Plan to Abolish the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

Gun Control Master Plan

March for Our Lives, the gun-control group founded after the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., has issued what it has termed a “peace plan.” A better description might be, “A Comprehensive Plan to Abolish the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.”

At its core, the program seeks to transmute gun ownership from a liberty that can be asserted against the government into a privilege that Americans can enjoy only with the permission of the state. Or, to put it another way, the program aims to repeal the Second Amendment without going through all that unpleasant “written-amendment” stuff.

Change the meaning of “the right of the people”

That’s not hyperbole. By its own admission, March for Our Lives wants to “reexamine the District of Columbia v. Heller interpretation of the Second Amendment,” which, in practice, would mean asking the U.S. Supreme Court to revise the Second Amendment’s obvious meaning so that “the right of the people” does not mean “the right of the people” anymore.

Worse still, the group is demanding that “the next generation of federal judges” must act not as impartial arbiters of the law, but as “champions of gun violence prevention.”

This presentation PROOVES WITHOUT DOUBT that America is in for a major fight that will put you and your family in the firing line, literally… So make sure you watch this presentation while it’s still online…

Which they’d pretty much have to if the group’s other ideas are to have a chance of surviving the judicial review they would inevitably provoke.

Multi-Step Approval Process

Were the “peace plan” to be adopted in toto by Congress, Americans seeking to obtain firearms would be obliged to go through a “multi-step approval process” that would be “overseen by a law enforcement agency.”

They would be required to register their guns—and themselves—with the federal government.

They would be forbidden from purchasing standard-capacity magazines, barred from owning the most-popular rifle in America and subjected to both waiting periods and limitations on the number of firearms they could legally buy in a month.

They would be on the receiving end of hefty purchase taxes and licensing fees that, in practice, would have the primary effect of making it more difficult for poorer people to own firearms.

And they would be subjected to a massive and unprecedented confiscation drive, the unabashed aim of which would be to “reduce the estimated 265–393 million firearms in circulation by at least 30 percent.”

Given the rank extremism of these ideas, it should perhaps come as no surprise that, at the heart of the agenda, there is also an open call for the federal government to go after the NRA and, one presumes, to shut it up.

Lock-step Agenda with the Democratic party

In essence, March for Our Lives’ “peace plan” is the full-scale, non-euphemized version of the agenda that the institutional Democratic party is, by baby steps, coming gradually to adopt.

The aims are uncannily alike:

First, to clear away the Second Amendment as an obstacle within the courts;

Second, to remove the NRA as a means by which America’s pro-gun majority can channel its political voice;

Third, to remove the most popular guns in the United States from the market—and, if possible, from their owner’s homes;

Finally, to introduce so many legislative roadblocks between the individual and the opportunity to bear arms that, at least in the “blue” states, that individual would give up trying.

“Common-sense regulation” becomes “There is no right to bear arms”

Until recently, “common-sense regulation” was the language of the hour. Now we are being told that, in fact, there is no right to bear arms—and that, insofar as such a “privilege” will be tolerated in America, it will be on limited, costly, intrusive and narrow terms.

This transformation has been dramatic. Almost overnight, the insistence that “nobody is coming for your guns” has been replaced with the admission that actually they are—and they want the “in common-use” ones, too.

This year alone, “all we want is background checks” has been thrown out in favor of a byzantine system in which prospective gun owners would have to obtain a federal license, satisfy a police officer and place themselves onto a national database.

Within the space of a few months, we have gone from hearing warnings about the importance of U.S. Supreme Court precedent to the explicit request that future judges behave like activists.

If you want to know where Beto O’Rourke, Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren are going to end up on this question of guns, look no further than March for Our Lives.

Is starting to feel like it’s every man for himself, Is possible that right now, a global crisis is upon us, Without even knowing… And the virus may not be the biggest threat, but the crisis that follows, Everyday goods that keep us alive will be gone, I’m talking, food, fresh water, medicine, clothes, fuel…

bnr

5 thoughts on “Common-Sense Regulation Becomes “There Is No Right To Bear Arms- A Comprehensive Plan to Abolish the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

  1. I will gladly give up my life to ensure that our Constitutional guaranteed God given rights are not abridged or disregarded, and the very first Amendment is the Right To Associate and/or Petition the Government, or to worship as I desire. Also remember my friends, “THE SECOND GUARANTEES THE FIRST”. If what is in those quotes does not pique your interest, then maybe you should truly look to understand just what side your bread is buttered on.

    The second Amendment, “The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” was inserted as the second Amendment as the most important item to be understood about a population because our founding fathers knew of the penchant of the human animal to try and screw each other at the drop of a hat, while governments gave them the means to do so because of it armaments. In other words my friends the people have the right to protect themselves from the government itself, and if those government minions don’t soon learn that their actions could put their lives at risk they will be viewed at the enemy of the people.

    Like

  2. THE DICK ACT OF 1902,anyone trying to abolish the right of the people to be armed.. is GUILTY OF TREASON,even if they suggest it,,THIS WAS WRITTEN TO HELP CONTROL DEVILS IN THE GOVERNMENT,THIS LAW IS STILL IN FULL FORCE,IT CAN’T BE REPEALED, right now vetrans should be out rounding up traitors to our country,AND THEN HANGING THEM FOR TREASON…OH thats right, they can’t,their head is completely up the traitors of americas ass..I guest they LIED TO GOD when they took that OATH TO HIM,well we know where they end up when its over…IN HELL..JUST REMEMBER YOU VETS,THESE PEOPLE YOU LOVE KILL CHILDREN,how do you think you and your family will fare when their told to go get YOU..think about it..,YOUR not just on the wrong side of GODS fence,right now, you have ONE FOOT INSIDE THE GATES OF HELL,and the other on a banana pell…NOWS THE TIME..GOD OR SATAN and satans minions….chose wisely….

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s